Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Boo Ghee Low

Hematology & Oncology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1629024955 CMS profile 254474

11209 N Tatum Blvd, 260, Phoenix, AZ 85028

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$25,267

1,168 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Boo Ghee Low of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $25,267 across 1,168 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $831 30
2024 General $6,244 244
2023 General $5,435 230
2022 General $4,177 203
2021 General $3,251 165
2020 General $2,020 104
2019 General $3,309 192

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Boo Ghee Low
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Boo Ghee Low were reported at $831. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Boo Ghee Low Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,309 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $2,020 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $3,251 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $4,177 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $5,435 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $6,244 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $831 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,440 107 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,949 82 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,363 61 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,338 62 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $1,229 56 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $1,083 70 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $1,083 40 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $1,016 59 payments
  9. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $1,012 42 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $876 27 payments
  11. Other $11,878 562 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $23,189 1,144 payments
  2. Education $1,346 16 payments
  3. Long term medical supply or device loan $732 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KEYTRUDA $1,229 56 payments
  2. KISQALI $926 29 payments
  3. OPDIVO $786 45 payments
  4. XTANDI $622 35 payments
  5. TECENTRIQ $538 27 payments
  6. TAGRISSO $513 16 payments
  7. IMBRUVICA Oncology $503 18 payments
  8. Alecensa $501 23 payments
  9. IMBRUVICA Oncology $443 22 payments
  10. LIBTAYO $434 18 payments
  11. Other $24,654 1,267 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

170

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$666,094

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

54.7%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 15 $276,944
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 13 $205,502
Tasigna Nilotinib Hcl Brand 14 $134,570
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 20 $24,740
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 15 $22,042
Dexamethasone Generic 17 $419
Hydroxyurea Generic 14 $388
Letrozole Generic 12 $388
Anastrozole Generic 12 $372
Ondansetron Odt Ondansetron Brand 16 $355

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 109 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,083,722

Of which drugs: $987,723

Medicare patients

390

Average age 77

Services billed

105,277

223 women, 167 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 74%
Arthritis 52%
Cancer 45%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Diabetes 28%
Osteoporosis 25%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ferric carboxymaltose, 1 mg J1439 Office 34 39,000 $34,156
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 14 1,620 $32,754
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 18 90 $433
Injection, palonosetron hcl, 25 mcg J2469 Office 15 480 $340
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 17 1,500 $153
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 24 508 $46
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 18 52 $34

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 95 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KISQALI
$568 — —
ORGOVYX
$299 — —
TAGRISSO
$207 — —
IMFINZI
$160 — —
KEYTRUDA
$155 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 95 with Patron

Records

1,168 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record