Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bilal Agha

Rheumatology Cary, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1154409266 CMS profile 52565

103 Parkway Office Ct Ste 202, Cary, NC 27518

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,581

719 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Bilal Agha of Cary, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,581 across 719 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,897 99
2024 General $2,264 133
2023 General $3,345 107
2022 General $2,112 107
2021 General $1,910 101
2020 General $1,620 74
2019 General $2,433 98

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bilal Agha
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bilal Agha were reported at $1,897. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Bilal Agha Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,433 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,620 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,910 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,112 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $3,345 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,264 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,897 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $2,435 117 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $2,163 122 payments
  3. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC $2,161 52 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,810 105 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $1,574 76 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,060 48 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $845 36 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $608 28 payments
  9. Radius Health, Inc. $472 17 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $307 16 payments
  11. Other $2,146 102 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,090 716 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,400 1 payment
  3. Education $91 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Cimzia $1,922 108 payments
  2. IDACIO $1,821 30 payments
  3. XELJANZ $1,477 91 payments
  4. RINVOQ $1,059 54 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $878 41 payments
  6. INFLECTRA $803 38 payments
  7. Otezla $745 41 payments
  8. TREMFYA $647 29 payments
  9. Enbrel $644 26 payments
  10. ORENCIA $569 27 payments
  11. Other $8,122 399 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 18 drugs

Part D claims

986

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$765,229

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

33.8%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 54 $380,195
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 34 $255,134
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 12 $80,769
Prolia Denosumab Brand 19 $32,666
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 214 $5,535
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 89 $4,097
Leflunomide Generic 37 $2,225
Sulfasalazine Generic 33 $1,026
Prednisone Generic 143 $895
Omeprazole Generic 36 $498

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 18 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,324,880

Of which drugs: $1,211,939

Medicare patients

204

Average age 76

Services billed

173,415

145 women, 59 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 52%
Diabetes 34%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Depression 23%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 22 14,750 $498,276
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 44 126,400 $455,166
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 63 5,943 $122,360
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 66 9,400 $962
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 18 33 $136
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 17 18 $115

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cimzia
$272 — 126,400
XELJANZ
$260 — —
IDACIO
$192 — —
TREMFYA
$167 — —
Enbrel
$152 34 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

719 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record