Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Betsy Reese

Sports Medicine Draper, UT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1477817443 CMS profile 946406

96 E Kimballs Ln Ste 207, Draper, UT 84020

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,013

182 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Betsy Reese of Draper, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,013 across 182 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $25 2
2024 General $99 5
2023 General $299 16
2022 General $959 55
2021 General $721 44
2020 General $419 27
2019 General $490 33

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Betsy Reese
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Betsy Reese were reported at $25. Among 1,257 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $114 and the middle half received between $39 and $293.

Show as a table
Year Betsy Reese Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $490 $119 $35–$362 $163
2020 $419 $77 $24–$275 $114
2021 $721 $104 $28–$340 $132
2022 $959 $94 $31–$272 $149
2023 $299 $91 $34–$271 $160
2024 $99 $126 $38–$294 $164
2025 $25 $114 $39–$293 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $443 26 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $225 11 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $202 11 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $158 10 payments
  5. Boston Scientific Corporation $152 9 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $131 9 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $126 8 payments
  8. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $123 9 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $109 8 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $103 6 payments
  11. Other $1,241 75 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,013 182 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Repatha $238 15 payments
  2. AIMOVIG $191 12 payments
  3. VRAYLAR $185 9 payments
  4. EVENITY $185 10 payments
  5. Prolia $185 10 payments
  6. Otezla $179 11 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $112 5 payments
  8. MYRBETRIQ $103 6 payments
  9. Vascepa $98 5 payments
  10. SHINGRIX $97 7 payments
  11. Other $2,740 172 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 97 drugs

Part D claims

3,923

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$221,009

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

19.9%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 31 $29,984
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 33 $28,443
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 18 $27,911
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 20 $23,395
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 13 $13,781
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 12 $13,261
Xigduo Xr Dapaglifloz Propaned/Metformin Brand 13 $12,161
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 12 $11,398
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 15 $7,649
Combivent Respimat Ipratropium/Albuterol Sulfate Brand 12 $5,775

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 97 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 47 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$43,032

Of which drugs: $6,553

Medicare patients

156

Average age 73

Services billed

1,126

115 women, 41 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 58%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Depression 21%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Osteoporosis 19%
Diabetes 15%
Heart failure 12%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 16 16 $1,309
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 36 492 $315
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 11 25 $142

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Zilretta
  • Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $26
$26 — —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $21
$21 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

182 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Sports Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record