Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Bennett Baquet

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Lafayette, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1073563631 CMS profile 93348

4212 W Congress St Ste 2300A, Lafayette, LA 70506

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,950

523 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Bennett Baquet of Lafayette, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,950 across 523 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,426 75
2024 General $1,104 62
2023 General $634 42
2022 General $1,066 64
2021 General $10,634 129
2020 General $7,254 70
2019 General $7,833 81

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Bennett Baquet
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Bennett Baquet were reported at $1,426. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Bennett Baquet Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $7,833 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $7,254 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $10,634 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $1,066 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $634 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $1,104 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $1,426 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $22,538 84 payments
  2. Dexcom, Inc. $1,831 118 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $674 47 payments
  4. Medtronic, Inc. $405 9 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $339 25 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $309 19 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $306 17 payments
  8. Horizon Therapeutics plc $241 14 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $239 11 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $220 13 payments
  11. Other $2,849 166 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $22,725 83 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $7,197 439 payments
  3. Education $28 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. t-slim insulin pump Endocrinology $9,100 41 payments
  2. t-slim insulin pump Endocrinology $6,900 22 payments
  3. t:slim X2 insulin pump $6,516 20 payments
  4. Dexcom G6 Transmitter Endocrinology $1,175 76 payments
  5. EVENITY $411 30 payments
  6. Prolia $411 30 payments
  7. DEXCOM G6 TRANSMITTER Endocrinology $355 22 payments
  8. FARXIGA $287 16 payments
  9. Minimed 770G System $225 1 payment
  10. Ozempic $225 18 payments
  11. Other $6,042 374 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 132 drugs

Part D claims

16,869

Median for Endocrinology: 1,959

Drug cost

$5,223,857

Median for Endocrinology: $890,201

Branded share of claims

46.8%

Median for Endocrinology: 57%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 660 $804,041
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 939 $802,354
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 522 $619,214
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 309 $381,560
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 372 $253,836
Somatuline Depot Lanreotide Acetate Brand 26 $204,951
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 187 $186,033
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 141 $148,716
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 229 $145,789
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 117 $145,456

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 132 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 6,527 Part D prescribers listed as Endocrinology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 49 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$555,392

Of which drugs: $187,090

Medicare patients

1,459

Average age 74

Services billed

25,557

934 women, 525 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 61%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 41%
Osteoporosis 30%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Depression 23%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 91 9,180 $186,931

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Korlym
  • Corcept Therapeutics $92
$92 — —
RECORLEV
  • Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $40
$40 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $37
$37 — —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $37
$37 — —
Crysvita
  • Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $36
$36 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

523 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record