Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Benjamin Solomon

Hematology & Oncology Salt Lake City, UT Medical Doctor

NPI 1518209485 CMS profile 6684767

1950 Circle Of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,824

148 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Benjamin Solomon of Salt Lake City, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,824 across 148 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 67th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,773 65
2024 General $917 46
2023 General $1,747 26
2022 General $372 10
2021 General $16 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Benjamin Solomon
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Benjamin Solomon were reported at $4,773. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Benjamin Solomon Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $0 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $16 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $372 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $1,747 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $917 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $4,773 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $3,570 24 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,006 7 payments
  3. Geron Corporation $780 1 payment
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $305 18 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $291 15 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $246 8 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $240 8 payments
  8. Eisai Inc. $158 8 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $152 8 payments
  10. Incyte Corporation $121 3 payments
  11. Other $954 48 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $4,760 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,908 138 payments
  3. Education $157 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Datroway $1,935 4 payments
  2. ENHERTU $1,587 17 payments
  3. DARZALEX $942 4 payments
  4. RYTELO $780 1 payment
  5. XTANDI $218 11 payments
  6. Fabhalta $173 11 payments
  7. Lenvima $158 8 payments
  8. IMFINZI $140 4 payments
  9. ORGOVYX $120 6 payments
  10. OPDIVO $112 6 payments
  11. Other $2,163 105 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 25 drugs

Part D claims

640

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$2,177,249

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

35.9%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Imbruvica Ibrutinib Brand 71 $1,138,400
Calquence Acalabrutinib Maleate Brand 25 $364,533
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 21 $194,527
Kisqali Ribociclib Succinate Brand 18 $181,260
Brukinsa Zanubrutinib Brand 13 $176,852
Tasigna Nilotinib Hcl Brand 11 $96,829
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 19 $13,105
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 24 $3,887
Anastrozole Generic 112 $1,774
Hydroxyurea Generic 35 $1,457

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 25 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 124 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,435,085

Of which drugs: $1,335,355

Medicare patients

222

Average age 74

Services billed

77,457

137 women, 85 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 43%
Cancer 35%
Diabetes 32%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Depression 27%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 4,140 $84,631
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 14 1,160 $99
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 15 95 $60

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 22 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $149
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $20
$169 — —
Fabhalta
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $144
$144 — —
OJJAARA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $49
$49 — —
OPDIVO
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $47
$47 — —
Lenvima
  • Eisai Inc. $42
$42 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 22 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

148 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record