Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2023 Reported 2020–2023 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Beau Chung

General Practice Diamond Bar, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1841746799 CMS profile 2214584

3220 S Brea Canyon Rd, Suite H, Diamond Bar, CA 91765

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$480

20 records reported · program years 2020–2023

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2020–2023

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2023, Beau Chung of Diamond Bar, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $480 across 20 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 68th percentile of General Practice profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2023 General $121 2
2021 General $205 11
2020 General $154 7

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Beau Chung
  • General Practice median
  • Middle half of General Practice
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Beau Chung were reported at $0. Among 4,774 General Practice profiles paid that year, the median was $106 and the middle half received between $35 and $292.

Show as a table
Year Beau Chung General Practice median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $107 $37–$285 $163
2020 $154 $75 $25–$213 $114
2021 $205 $93 $30–$272 $132
2022 $0 $103 $36–$279 $149
2023 $121 $106 $34–$276 $160
2024 $0 $114 $39–$290 $164
2025 $0 $106 $35–$292 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2023
  1. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $121 2 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $99 5 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $98 6 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $67 2 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $40 2 payments
  6. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $22 1 payment
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $18 1 payment
  8. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $16 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2020–2023
  1. Food and Beverage $480 20 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2020–2023
  1. QUVIVIQ $121 2 payments
  2. FARXIGA $98 6 payments
  3. JARDIANCE Diabetes $67 2 payments
  4. JARDIANCE Diabetes $55 3 payments
  5. TRULICITY $55 3 payments
  6. EMGALITY $43 2 payments
  7. REYVOW $43 2 payments
  8. BASAGLAR $41 2 payments
  9. EVENITY $40 2 payments
  10. Prolia $40 2 payments
  11. Other $73 4 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 86 drugs

Part D claims

3,593

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$207,851

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

15.4%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 24 $34,900
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 26 $23,673
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 15 $21,371
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 18 $21,344
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 15 $16,299
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 16 $14,718
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 11 $11,612
Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide Brand 11 $8,563
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 12 $6,766
Edarbyclor Azilsartan Med/Chlorthalidone Brand 13 $3,261

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 86 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 17 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$32,575

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

101

Average age 74

Services billed

555

54 women, 47 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 60%
Arthritis 26%
Diabetes 21%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Cancer 18%
Osteoporosis 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Heart failure 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

20 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other General Practice in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record