Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Ashish Vala

Sports Medicine Sugar Land, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1225267412 CMS profile 796687

1429 Highway 6 Ste 304, Sugar Land, TX 77478

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,254

106 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Ashish Vala of Sugar Land, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,254 across 106 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Sports Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $188 6
2024 General $155 8
2023 General $603 21
2022 General $195 10
2021 General $562 30
2020 General $299 17
2019 General $252 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Ashish Vala
  • Sports Medicine median
  • Middle half of Sports Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Ashish Vala were reported at $188. Among 1,257 Sports Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $114 and the middle half received between $39 and $293.

Show as a table
Year Ashish Vala Sports Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $252 $119 $35–$362 $163
2020 $299 $77 $24–$275 $114
2021 $562 $104 $28–$340 $132
2022 $195 $94 $31–$272 $149
2023 $603 $91 $34–$271 $160
2024 $155 $126 $38–$294 $164
2025 $188 $114 $39–$293 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $503 25 payments
  2. Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $252 6 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $229 10 payments
  4. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $183 12 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $163 8 payments
  6. DePuy Synthes Sales Inc. $132 6 payments
  7. Fidia Pharma USA Inc. $95 4 payments
  8. Bioventus LLC $90 4 payments
  9. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. $71 4 payments
  10. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $54 3 payments
  11. Other $482 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,126 105 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $128 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Iovera $252 6 payments
  2. Otezla $233 11 payments
  3. Cimzia $229 10 payments
  4. Enbrel Inflammation $171 7 payments
  5. COSENTYX $163 8 payments
  6. ORTHOVISC $116 5 payments
  7. MONOVISC $116 5 payments
  8. Enbrel Inflammation $109 6 payments
  9. HYMOVIS $95 4 payments
  10. Horizant $94 6 payments
  11. Other $1,224 66 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

728

Median for Sports Medicine: 144

Drug cost

$191,084

Median for Sports Medicine: $1,027

Branded share of claims

6.9%

Median for Sports Medicine: 0%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Diclofenac Potassium Generic 85 $125,359
Relafen Ds Nabumetone Brand 13 $38,610
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 148 $21,911
Lidocaine Generic 68 $1,722
Gabapentin Generic 71 $1,039
Lidocaine-Prilocaine Lidocaine/Prilocaine Brand 37 $748
Naproxen Generic 50 $722
Prednisone Generic 210 $456
Nabumetone Generic 12 $296
Tramadol Hcl Generic 21 $127

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,691 Part D prescribers listed as Sports Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 57 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$254,024

Of which drugs: $143,185

Medicare patients

202

Average age 77

Services billed

14,111

129 women, 73 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 39%
Chronic kidney disease 31%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 20%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Hyaluronan or derivative, hymovis, for intra-articular injection, 1 mg J7322 Office 79 8,208 $109,947
Hyaluronan or derivative, orthovisc, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7324 Office 30 165 $15,878
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, preservative-free, extended-release, microsphere formulation, 1 mg J3304 Office 16 864 $11,927
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 72 568 $428
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 13 62 $33

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Crysvita
  • Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $16
$16 — —
HORIZANT
  • CutisPharma, Inc. $14
$14 — —
Zilretta
  • Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $7
$7 — 864
Exparel
  • Pacira Pharmaceuticals Incorporated $7
$7 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

106 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Sports Medicine in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record