Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Aruna Baratham

Rheumatology Overland Park, KS Medical Doctor

NPI 1518989557 CMS profile 114629

8401 W 125Th St, Overland Park, KS 66213

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$22,844

1,363 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Aruna Baratham of Overland Park, KS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $22,844 across 1,363 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $4,764 249
2024 General $4,484 254
2023 General $4,127 230
2022 General $3,117 187
2021 General $2,672 176
2020 General $1,730 110
2019 General $1,951 157

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Aruna Baratham
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Aruna Baratham were reported at $4,764. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Aruna Baratham Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,951 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,730 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,672 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,117 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $4,127 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $4,484 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $4,764 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $3,109 192 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $2,690 160 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,947 86 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,475 88 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,397 109 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,232 82 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,081 72 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $950 60 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $816 51 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $793 44 payments
  11. Other $7,354 419 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $22,553 1,355 payments
  2. Education $291 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $2,093 129 payments
  2. XELJANZ $1,296 103 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $1,087 39 payments
  4. BENLYSTA $930 62 payments
  5. SIMPONI ARIA $855 61 payments
  6. TALTZ $815 50 payments
  7. Cimzia $798 49 payments
  8. ACTHAR $793 44 payments
  9. TREMFYA $728 30 payments
  10. ORENCIA $725 51 payments
  11. Other $17,747 1,044 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

1,137

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 449

Drug cost

$28,929

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: $169,700

Branded share of claims

30.6%

Median for Allergy/ Immunology: 37.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 310 $13,761
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 337 $6,473
Leflunomide Generic 59 $2,181
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 47 $1,332
Sulfasalazine Generic 58 $1,119
Fluticasone-Salmeterol Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 11 $1,115
Prednisone Generic 119 $862
Folic Acid Generic 67 $789
Azathioprine Generic 12 $324
Gabapentin Generic 23 $243

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,579 Part D prescribers listed as Allergy/ Immunology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 44 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$982,541

Of which drugs: $914,439

Medicare patients

207

Average age 72

Services billed

107,950

150 women, 57 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Arthritis 75%
High blood pressure 68%
Osteoporosis 30%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 21%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
COPD 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 23 12,775 $431,959
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 31 69,600 $251,186
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 15 10,300 $93,318
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 13 1,320 $26,982
Infusion, normal saline solution, 250 cc J7050 Office 48 565 $292
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 20 88 $65

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 48 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$352 — —
ACTHAR
$348 — —
SKYRIZI
$263 — —
RINVOQ
$254 — —
SAPHNELO
$243 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 48 with Patron

Records

1,363 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Kansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record