Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Antonio Hernandez

Internal Medicine Goose Creek, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1871577460 CMS profile 39969

100 Springhall Dr, Goose Creek, SC 29445

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,461

431 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Antonio Hernandez of Goose Creek, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,461 across 431 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 92nd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $93 1
2022 General $957 58
2021 General $2,419 141
2020 General $2,204 121
2019 General $1,787 110

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Antonio Hernandez
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Antonio Hernandez were reported at $93. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Antonio Hernandez Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,787 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $2,204 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,419 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $957 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $0 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $93 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $875 48 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $818 50 payments
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $528 31 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $499 32 payments
  5. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $363 22 payments
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $340 22 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $312 15 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $301 17 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $297 16 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $238 8 payments
  11. Other $2,890 170 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,349 429 payments
  2. Education $112 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $721 38 payments
  2. Ozempic $582 37 payments
  3. XARELTO $528 31 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $412 24 payments
  5. TRULICITY $291 19 payments
  6. JARDIANCE Diabetes $287 19 payments
  7. JARDIANCE Diabetes $246 13 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT $231 12 payments
  9. ENTRESTO $217 12 payments
  10. Prolia $213 10 payments
  11. Other $5,943 368 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 66 drugs

Part D claims

7,361

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$123,774

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

11.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 201 $31,629
Xifaxan Rifaximin Brand 25 $21,181
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 573 $6,725
Donepezil Hcl Generic 273 $4,226
Amlodipine Besylate Generic 586 $4,097
Omeprazole Generic 228 $3,808
Pravastatin Sodium Generic 306 $3,667
Levetiracetam Generic 290 $3,491
Tamsulosin Hcl Generic 395 $3,400
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 26 $3,113

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 66 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Records

431 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record