Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anthony Lam

Internal Medicine Tustin, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1659502839 CMS profile 1065216

2895 Edinger Ave, Tustin, CA 92780

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$80,498

606 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$186,194 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Anthony Lam of Tustin, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $80,498 across 606 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $186,194 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $33,812 140
2024 General $8,082 94
2023 General $32,416 111
2022 General $1,808 84
2021 General $1,466 68
2020 General $930 43
2019 General $1,985 66

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anthony Lam
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anthony Lam were reported at $33,812. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Anthony Lam Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,985 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $930 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,466 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,808 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $32,416 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $8,082 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $33,812 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $67,246 78 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,619 56 payments
  3. Incyte Corporation $1,534 54 payments
  4. Exelixis Inc. $910 34 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $904 32 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $893 50 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $877 34 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $756 33 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $503 15 payments
  10. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. $401 15 payments
  11. Other $4,854 205 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $41,509 13 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $17,161 9 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $14,146 551 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $6,689 21 payments
  5. Education $992 12 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Nubeqa $66,136 72 payments
  2. Xofigo $1,113 8 payments
  3. XTANDI $1,074 48 payments
  4. JAKAFI $1,059 47 payments
  5. Vitrakvi $1,001 1 payment
  6. ERLEADA $703 20 payments
  7. DARZALEX $561 27 payments
  8. CABOMETYX $484 19 payments
  9. LYNPARZA $422 14 payments
  10. TECVAYLI $376 7 payments
  11. Other $10,058 460 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

390

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$2,106,406

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

56.9%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xtandi Enzalutamide Brand 61 $894,781
Nubeqa Darolutamide Brand 37 $496,424
Orgovyx Relugolix Brand 98 $258,719
Cabometyx Cabozantinib S-Malate Brand 15 $243,990
Lenalidomide Generic 11 $109,712
Imatinib Mesylate Generic 12 $57,357
Lupron Depot Leuprolide Acetate Brand 11 $42,773
Anastrozole Generic 70 $1,160
Hydroxyurea Generic 22 $648
Megestrol Acetate Generic 12 $486

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$54,332

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

37

Average age 77

Services billed

2,548

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Cancer 75%
Diabetes 65%
Arthritis 41%
Chronic kidney disease 35%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 40 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Nubeqa
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $5,397
$5,397 37 —
Xofigo
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $470
$470 — —
JAKAFI
  • Incyte Corporation $385
$385 — —
VENCLEXTA
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $125
  • AbbVie, Inc. $14
$140 — —
IMBRUVICA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $125
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 40 with Patron

Records

606 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record