Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anna Burke

Neurology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1730379819 CMS profile 783008

240 W Thomas Rd # 301, Phoenix, AZ 85013

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$216,102

144 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,532

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,996,307 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Anna Burke of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $216,102 across 144 general payments and $2,532 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,996,307 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $70,497 36
2024 General $63,776 41
2023 General $34,584 19
2022 General $42,154 43
2022 Research $2,262 2
2021 General $4,954 3
2020 General $123 1
2020 Research $270 1
2019 General $14 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anna Burke
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anna Burke were reported at $70,497. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Anna Burke Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $14 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $123 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $4,954 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $42,154 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $34,584 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $63,776 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $70,497 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $106,400 88 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $81,521 31 payments
  3. Eisai Inc. $24,435 19 payments
  4. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc $1,700 1 payment
  5. Genentech, Inc. $1,695 1 payment
  6. Biogen, Inc. $337 3 payments
  7. Arbor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $14 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $117,740 28 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $52,225 19 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $37,555 61 payments
  4. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $6,940 1 payment
  5. Food and Beverage $1,612 34 payments
  6. Education $30 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. KISUNLA $49,356 23 payments
  2. Leqembi $13,746 10 payments
  3. NUPLAZID $1,700 1 payment
  4. ADUHELM $214 2 payments
  5. AMYVID $137 1 payment
  6. EMGALITY $39 1 payment
  7. Horizant $14 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,532 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

2,359

Median for Psychiatry: 574

Drug cost

$149,572

Median for Psychiatry: $27,624

Branded share of claims

9.3%

Median for Psychiatry: 17%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 16 $77,326
Rivastigmine Generic 123 $23,821
Memantine Hcl Generic 409 $14,989
Donepezil Hcl Generic 706 $9,285
Divalproex Sodium Generic 89 $3,916
Sertraline Hcl Generic 200 $3,524
Quetiapine Fumarate Generic 117 $2,941
Mirtazapine Generic 90 $2,699
Olanzapine Generic 31 $1,338
Trazodone Hcl Generic 109 $1,138

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 20,488 Part D prescribers listed as Psychiatry; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 8 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$96,257

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

351

Average age 78

Services billed

735

187 women, 164 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Alzheimer's or dementia 75%
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 51%
Depression 44%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Diabetes 21%
Atrial fibrillation 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

3 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
KISUNLA
  • Eli Lilly and Company $12,625
  • Lilly USA, LLC $12,434
$25,059 — —
Leqembi
  • Eisai Inc. $7,101
$7,101 — —
EMGALITY
  • Eli Lilly and Company $39
$39 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

147 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record