Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anjani Pandya

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Sugar Land, TX Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1639524457 CMS profile 1601801

17520 W Grand Pkwy S Ste 110, Sugar Land, TX 77479

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,312

635 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$273,305 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2024–2025

Through program year 2025, Anjani Pandya of Sugar Land, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,312 across 635 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $273,305 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 79th percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,880 144
2024 General $3,030 167
2023 General $2,249 142
2022 General $2,608 151
2021 General $527 30
2019 General $18 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anjani Pandya
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anjani Pandya were reported at $2,880. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Anjani Pandya Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $18 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $0 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $527 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $2,608 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $2,249 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $3,030 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $2,880 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dexcom, Inc. $2,085 165 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $1,112 61 payments
  3. Insulet Corporation $882 20 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $853 38 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $715 42 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $604 32 payments
  7. Radius Health, Inc. $540 24 payments
  8. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $348 18 payments
  9. Zealand Pharma US, Inc. $332 18 payments
  10. Abbott Laboratories $329 20 payments
  11. Other $3,512 197 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,288 634 payments
  2. Education $23 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $2,038 162 payments
  2. Omnipod $882 20 payments
  3. FARXIGA $853 38 payments
  4. JARDIANCE $475 26 payments
  5. Tymlos $460 20 payments
  6. EVENITY $422 23 payments
  7. Prolia $422 23 payments
  8. Ozempic $407 24 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $372 23 payments
  10. Yorvipath $307 12 payments
  11. Other $6,153 355 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,809

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,039,009

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

67.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 189 $285,911
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 85 $134,901
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 68 $98,808
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 83 $85,319
Tymlos Abaloparatide Brand 21 $74,903
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 41 $48,053
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 29 $43,700
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 79 $42,336
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 40 $34,045
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 19 $22,716

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 9 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$49,387

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

214

Average age 73

Services billed

710

145 women, 69 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 61%
Arthritis 51%
Chronic kidney disease 35%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Osteoporosis 31%
Depression 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $168
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $76
$244 83 —
Tymlos
  • Radius Health, Inc. $221
$221 21 —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $168
$168 41 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $148
$148 85 —
Korlym
  • Corcept Therapeutics $99
$99 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

635 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record