Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Anil George

Internal Medicine Jacksonville, FL Medical Doctor

NPI 1679639470 CMS profile 30832

580 W 8Th St, # 6009, Jacksonville, FL 32209

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,257

670 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$391,318 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2022–2025

Through program year 2025, Anil George of Jacksonville, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,257 across 670 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $391,318 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,177 48
2024 General $1,693 85
2023 General $2,095 111
2022 General $2,189 114
2021 General $2,354 130
2020 General $1,414 97
2019 General $1,335 85

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Anil George
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Anil George were reported at $1,177. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Anil George Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,335 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,414 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,354 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,189 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,095 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,693 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,177 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,705 94 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $993 64 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $816 42 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $719 43 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $668 43 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $645 40 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $612 38 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $602 43 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $464 28 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $460 26 payments
  11. Other $4,573 209 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,878 665 payments
  2. Education $379 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $816 42 payments
  2. LOKELMA $702 36 payments
  3. Ozempic $701 45 payments
  4. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $682 41 payments
  5. RYBELSUS $554 32 payments
  6. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $419 5 payments
  7. Vascepa $413 25 payments
  8. VERQUVO $406 22 payments
  9. FARXIGA $403 19 payments
  10. Prolia $347 20 payments
  11. Other $9,779 580 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 185 drugs

Part D claims

11,979

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,175,849

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

21.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 146 $157,468
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 113 $131,582
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 124 $112,816
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 95 $103,724
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 51 $61,089
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 49 $60,652
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 66 $53,102
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 49 $51,298
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 31 $43,222
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 28 $42,921

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 185 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 51 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$150,154

Of which drugs: $1,989

Medicare patients

265

Average age 75

Services billed

2,600

160 women, 105 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 55%
Diabetes 47%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Heart failure 25%
Depression 20%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 24 24 $1,882
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 18 31 $31

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 31 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Kerendia
$160 — —
RECORLEV
$141 — —
LOKELMA
$140 — —
MOUNJARO
$109 51 —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
$92 31 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 31 with Patron

Records

670 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record