Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Andrew Peterson

Internal Medicine Biloxi, MS Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1306826854 CMS profile 13422

147 Reynoir Street, Suite 101, Biloxi, MS 39530

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,677

170 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Andrew Peterson of Biloxi, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,677 across 170 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 82nd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $556 29
2024 General $391 21
2023 General $501 27
2022 General $301 18
2021 General $168 12
2020 General $203 14
2019 General $558 49

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Andrew Peterson
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Andrew Peterson were reported at $556. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Andrew Peterson Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $558 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $203 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $168 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $301 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $501 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $391 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $556 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $296 18 payments
  2. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $203 11 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $166 10 payments
  4. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $160 8 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $153 11 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $151 9 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $136 8 payments
  8. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $129 19 payments
  9. Abbott Laboratories $100 5 payments
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $94 6 payments
  11. Other $1,090 65 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,592 157 payments
  2. Education $85 13 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $203 11 payments
  2. REXULTI $160 8 payments
  3. Trintellix $129 19 payments
  4. PREVNAR 20 $105 6 payments
  5. FARXIGA $93 7 payments
  6. EVENITY $90 5 payments
  7. JANUMET $85 6 payments
  8. JANUVIA $85 6 payments
  9. Prolia $78 5 payments
  10. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $77 4 payments
  11. Other $2,691 164 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 169 drugs

Part D claims

8,603

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$961,235

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

24.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 158 $162,476
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 83 $103,951
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 65 $76,033
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 58 $73,159
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 12 $47,775
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 56 $47,468
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 38 $41,278
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 29 $34,566
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 43 $32,176
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 36 $31,233

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 169 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$236,565

Of which drugs: $65,953

Medicare patients

326

Average age 74

Services billed

22,666

188 women, 138 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 64%
Chronic kidney disease 44%
Diabetes 35%
Depression 34%
Osteoporosis 31%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
COPD 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 26 2,520 $52,143
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 130 131 $9,472
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 11 51 $50

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $42
$42 — —
ABRYSVO
  • PFIZER INC. $24
$24 — —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $23
$23 11 —
GIVLAARI
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. $22
$22 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $20
$20 38 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

170 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record