Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Andre Dixon

Medical Oncology Wilson, NC Medical Doctor

NPI 1649634486 CMS profile 3530888

2624 Ortho Dr W, Wilson, NC 27893

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,415

776 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Andre Dixon of Wilson, NC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,415 across 776 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 69th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,561 158
2024 General $4,020 184
2023 General $3,628 182
2022 General $3,849 187
2021 General $1,231 63
2020 General $100 1
2019 General $27 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Andre Dixon
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Andre Dixon were reported at $3,561. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Andre Dixon Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $27 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $100 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $1,231 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $3,849 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $3,628 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $4,020 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $3,561 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,047 62 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $956 35 payments
  3. Dendreon Pharmaceuticals LLC $896 39 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $838 40 payments
  5. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $746 33 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $722 39 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $619 28 payments
  8. Celgene Corporation $577 31 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $450 20 payments
  10. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $442 22 payments
  11. Other $9,121 427 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,352 761 payments
  2. Education $1,064 15 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. PROVENGE $896 39 payments
  2. KEYTRUDA $810 39 payments
  3. ENHERTU $626 27 payments
  4. LIBTAYO $449 20 payments
  5. XTANDI $398 18 payments
  6. OPDIVO $378 18 payments
  7. Lenvima $363 18 payments
  8. IMBRUVICA $326 10 payments
  9. RYBREVANT $309 5 payments
  10. ERLEADA $301 13 payments
  11. Other $13,514 703 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,148

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$3,771,622

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

55.1%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 30 $456,012
Jakafi Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 23 $405,130
Darzalex Faspro Daratumumab-Hyaluronidase-Fihj Brand 19 $363,517
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 15 $350,408
Opdivo Nivolumab Brand 23 $291,434
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 15 $229,888
Udenyca Pegfilgrastim-Cbqv Brand 45 $198,283
Kadcyla Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine Brand 11 $173,666
Erleada Apalutamide Brand 12 $173,260
Procrit Epoetin Alfa Brand 52 $169,955

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 89 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$857,575

Of which drugs: $746,485

Medicare patients

329

Average age 75

Services billed

50,717

200 women, 129 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 43%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Diabetes 39%
Heart failure 34%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Cancer 31%
COPD 30%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 46 7,032 $145,040
Injection, ferric derisomaltose, 10 mg J1437 Office 23 2,900 $45,364
Injection, zoledronic acid, 1 mg J3489 Office 12 60 $314
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 16 1,116 $100
Infusion, normal saline solution , 1000 cc J7030 Office 11 48 $93
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 12 90 $81
Injection, diphenhydramine hcl, up to 50 mg J1200 Office 11 45 $30

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 86 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ENHERTU
$318 — —
RYBREVANT
$288 — —
PROVENGE
$170 — —
KEYTRUDA
$120 — —
Lenvima
$104 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 86 with Patron

Records

776 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in North Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record