Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amit Panwalkar

Hematology & Oncology Fargo, ND Medical Doctor

NPI 1043426034 CMS profile 535389

820 4Th St N, Fargo, ND 58102

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$64

3 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$589,181 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Amit Panwalkar of Fargo, ND is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $64 across 3 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $589,181 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 7th percentile of Hematology & Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $52 2
2021 General $12 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amit Panwalkar
  • Hematology & Oncology median
  • Middle half of Hematology & Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amit Panwalkar were reported at $52. Among 8,769 Hematology & Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $683 and the middle half received between $143 and $3,154.

Show as a table
Year Amit Panwalkar Hematology & Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $529 $121–$2,516 $163
2020 $0 $339 $82–$2,213 $114
2021 $12 $263 $49–$1,965 $132
2022 $0 $416 $103–$2,395 $149
2023 $0 $542 $125–$2,646 $160
2024 $0 $692 $141–$3,008 $164
2025 $52 $683 $143–$3,154 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $52 2 payments
  2. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $12 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Education $64 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Padcev $52 2 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 42 drugs

Part D claims

1,648

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 604

Drug cost

$935,391

Median for Hematology-Oncology: $1,306,514

Branded share of claims

13.4%

Median for Hematology-Oncology: 31.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ibrance Palbociclib Brand 21 $322,809
Revlimid Lenalidomide Brand 14 $282,973
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 11 $171,287
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 76 $53,381
Abiraterone Acetate Generic 35 $38,880
Exemestane Generic 73 $14,771
Zenpep Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 13 $13,024
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 17 $9,458
Anastrozole Generic 383 $9,033
Advair Hfa Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 11 $4,655

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 42 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 8,746 Part D prescribers listed as Hematology-Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$58,387

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

322

Average age 74

Services billed

1,956

261 women, 61 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 45%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Diabetes 26%
Osteoporosis 25%
Depression 23%
Ischemic heart disease 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

3 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hematology & Oncology in North Dakota

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record