Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amir Azadi

Medical Oncology Phoenix, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1154615607 CMS profile 97971

2910 N 3Rd Ave # 470, Phoenix, AZ 85013

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$24,955

176 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$126,495 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2021

Through program year 2025, Amir Azadi of Phoenix, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $24,955 across 176 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $126,495 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Medical Oncology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,443 30
2024 General $6,837 50
2023 General $12,589 48
2022 General $1,839 27
2021 General $430 9
2020 General $1,311 7
2019 General $506 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amir Azadi
  • Medical Oncology median
  • Middle half of Medical Oncology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amir Azadi were reported at $1,443. Among 3,316 Medical Oncology profiles paid that year, the median was $1,128 and the middle half received between $147 and $5,675.

Show as a table
Year Amir Azadi Medical Oncology median Middle half National median
2019 $506 $968 $140–$6,658 $163
2020 $1,311 $747 $102–$5,891 $114
2021 $430 $430 $50–$4,098 $132
2022 $1,839 $812 $127–$4,907 $149
2023 $12,589 $957 $144–$5,248 $160
2024 $6,837 $1,042 $149–$5,650 $164
2025 $1,443 $1,128 $147–$5,675 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Seattle Genetics, Inc. $11,378 18 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $3,625 10 payments
  3. Novocure Inc. $2,010 27 payments
  4. GT Medical Technologies, Inc $1,776 11 payments
  5. Monteris Medical Corporation $1,670 18 payments
  6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $1,165 6 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $352 11 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $278 14 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $253 9 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $217 8 payments
  11. Other $2,231 44 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $14,250 5 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $8,579 166 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,000 1 payment
  4. Consulting Fee $900 1 payment
  5. Education $226 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TUKYSA $14,822 23 payments
  2. GammaTile $1,776 11 payments
  3. Neuroblate $1,670 18 payments
  4. Optune $1,208 16 payments
  5. Vitrakvi $1,149 5 payments
  6. Oncology $562 7 payments
  7. OPDIVO $253 9 payments
  8. ENHERTU Oncology $212 5 payments
  9. Da Vinci Surgical System $196 2 payments
  10. ENHERTU Oncology $162 3 payments
  11. Other $2,742 81 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

397

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$237,342

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

21.4%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Verzenio Abemaciclib Brand 13 $198,991
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 42 $34,109
Levetiracetam Generic 44 $1,133
Dexamethasone Generic 85 $789
Anastrozole Generic 20 $554
Levetiracetam Er Levetiracetam Brand 13 $329
Memantine Hcl Generic 17 $299
Ondansetron Hcl Generic 28 $293
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 20 $190
Modafinil Generic 13 $173

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 11 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$32,386

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

105

Average age 73

Services billed

383

53 women, 52 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 60%
Cancer 39%
Depression 36%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Heart failure 22%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TUKYSA
  • PFIZER INC. $3,539
$3,539 — —
ENHERTU
  • Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $133
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $119
$252 — —
Trodelvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $135
$135 — —
Orserdu
  • Stemline Therapeutics Inc. $124
$124 — —
VENCLEXTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $81
$81 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

176 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Medical Oncology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record