Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amir Agha

Rheumatology Anderson, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1730144114 CMS profile 260425

2000 E Greenville St, Anderson, SC 29621

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$42,176

723 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Amir Agha of Anderson, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $42,176 across 723 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,092 61
2024 General $1,532 77
2023 General $1,607 85
2022 General $1,603 96
2021 General $4,085 123
2020 General $5,423 79
2019 General $26,834 202

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amir Agha
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amir Agha were reported at $1,092. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Amir Agha Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $26,834 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $5,423 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $4,085 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,603 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,607 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,532 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,092 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $19,063 43 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $10,171 172 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $4,368 74 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $2,031 78 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,599 100 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $669 55 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $664 35 payments
  8. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $386 9 payments
  9. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $309 13 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $302 11 payments
  11. Other $2,614 133 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $20,145 11 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,523 691 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $4,743 2 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $4,591 14 payments
  5. Education $173 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otezla Dermatology $18,855 31 payments
  2. Otezla Inflammation $6,985 90 payments
  3. COSENTYX $3,954 54 payments
  4. Otezla Inflammation $2,150 3 payments
  5. TREMFYA $1,958 59 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $1,784 59 payments
  7. Cimzia $1,362 91 payments
  8. STELARA $1,141 21 payments
  9. Enbrel $705 53 payments
  10. XELJANZ $624 50 payments
  11. Other $6,885 381 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 52 drugs

Part D claims

5,579

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,885,753

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

15.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 68 $506,502
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 31 $257,560
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 28 $221,131
Xeljanz Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 33 $217,834
Otezla Apremilast Brand 18 $149,073
Orencia Abatacept Brand 18 $109,249
Enbrel Mini Etanercept Brand 14 $107,649
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 13 $85,040
Simponi Golimumab Brand 12 $76,273
Cimzia (2 Pack) Certolizumab Pegol Brand 12 $74,521

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 52 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 27 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,507,288

Of which drugs: $1,283,503

Medicare patients

434

Average age 73

Services billed

143,612

300 women, 134 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Ischemic heart disease 24%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 21%
Atrial fibrillation 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 64 57,030 $518,334
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 12 9,850 $332,958
Injection, certolizumab pegol, 1 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0717 Office 12 51,200 $185,856
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 23 4,620 $115,377
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 33 3,720 $63,795
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 113 319 $1,597

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
$200 — —
Cimzia
$156 12 51,200
COSENTYX
$152 — —
Enbrel
$144 82 —
XELJANZ
$144 33 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

723 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record