Medical Doctor Program year 2024 Reported 2019–2024 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amila Silva

Ophthalmology Stanford, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1083855670 CMS profile 94326

300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$23,684

62 records reported · program years 2019–2024

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2024

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2024, Amila Silva of Stanford, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $23,684 across 62 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2024 General $862 10
2023 General $2,130 4
2022 General $6,948 13
2021 General $13,500 32
2019 General $245 3

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amila Silva
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amila Silva were reported at $0. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Amila Silva Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $245 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $0 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $13,500 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $6,948 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $2,130 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $862 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $0 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Alcon Research LLC $19,342 19 payments
  2. Alcon Vision LLC $2,931 2 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $431 11 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $306 11 payments
  5. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $228 7 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $160 3 payments
  7. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $128 1 payment
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $66 3 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $24 1 payment
  10. Genentech, Inc. $21 1 payment
  11. Other $47 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Consulting Fee $21,350 11 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $1,600 44 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $734 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Constellation $2,830 2 payments
  2. Lucentis $334 7 payments
  3. EYLEA $292 10 payments
  4. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $176 4 payments
  5. OZURDEX Retina $160 3 payments
  6. NGENUITY $131 1 payment
  7. VABYSMO $119 5 payments
  8. OZURDEX Eye Care $66 3 payments
  9. YUTIQ $52 3 payments
  10. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $52 3 payments
  11. Other $107 6 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 11 drugs

Part D claims

568

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$18,690

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

33.8%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 187 $9,593
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 31 $2,663
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 50 $1,918
Fluorometholone Generic 15 $844
Acetazolamide Generic 13 $764
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 56 $712
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 33 $623
Latanoprost Generic 65 $622
Polymyxin B Sul-Trimethoprim Polymyxin B Sulf/Trimethoprim Brand 82 $541
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 21 $243

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 11 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,757,847

Of which drugs: $1,268,960

Medicare patients

940

Average age 77

Services billed

198,484

538 women, 402 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Diabetes 42%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Osteoporosis 20%
Heart failure 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 118 24,840 $683,259
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 27 1,696 $198,848
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 52 294 $193,454
Chloroprocaine hcl ophthalmic, 3% gel, 1 mg J2403 Office 89 164,000 $83,607
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 21 231 $28,472
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 33 120 $5,663
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 12 52 $41

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $66
$66 — —
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $26
$26 — —
DEXTENZA
  • Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. $16
$16 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $14
$14 — —
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

62 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record