Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amie Shannon

Dermatology Baton Rouge, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1386631935 CMS profile 243981

5326 O'Donovan Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70808

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,914

790 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$237,533 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Amie Shannon of Baton Rouge, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,914 across 790 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $237,533 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,878 216
2024 General $2,377 147
2023 General $1,852 113
2022 General $2,609 140
2021 General $1,038 63
2020 General $1,034 48
2019 General $1,124 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amie Shannon
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amie Shannon were reported at $2,878. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Amie Shannon Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,124 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,034 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,038 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,609 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $1,852 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $2,377 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $2,878 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,527 149 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,465 103 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $1,191 52 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $1,108 52 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $854 58 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $775 68 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $740 55 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $707 43 payments
  9. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $495 51 payments
  10. UCB, Inc. $389 25 payments
  11. Other $2,662 134 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,739 782 payments
  2. Education $175 8 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DUPIXENT $1,496 65 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,265 89 payments
  3. SKYRIZI $1,086 73 payments
  4. Otezla $1,082 50 payments
  5. RINVOQ $858 43 payments
  6. ADBRY $666 61 payments
  7. CIBINQO $665 51 payments
  8. TALTZ $587 42 payments
  9. EUCRISA $491 37 payments
  10. STELARA $491 37 payments
  11. Other $7,202 472 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 36 drugs

Part D claims

1,736

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$888,174

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

18.9%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 66 $250,042
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 15 $137,469
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 13 $97,892
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 12 $89,618
Nemluvio Nemolizumab-Ilto Brand 17 $89,329
Taltz Autoinjector Ixekizumab Brand 13 $89,005
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 29 $80,134
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 11 $21,304
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 104 $4,824
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 67 $4,258

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 36 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 63 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$144,116

Of which drugs: $9,129

Medicare patients

657

Average age 74

Services billed

5,435

425 women, 232 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 45%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Diabetes 23%
Depression 21%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Cancer 15%
Osteoporosis 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 25 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
$482 66 —
SKYRIZI
$282 — —
Otezla
$208 — —
TREMFYA
$170 — —
Bimzelx
$152 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 25 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

790 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record