Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Amanda Dehlendorf

Internal Medicine Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1871704270 CMS profile 176168

615 S New Ballas Rd, Saint Louis, MO 63141

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,620

430 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Amanda Dehlendorf of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,620 across 430 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,524 48
2024 General $678 30
2023 General $653 33
2022 General $512 27
2021 General $955 66
2020 General $1,208 86
2019 General $2,090 140

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Amanda Dehlendorf
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Amanda Dehlendorf were reported at $7,524. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Amanda Dehlendorf Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,090 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,208 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $955 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $512 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $653 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $678 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $7,524 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $6,754 18 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,031 104 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,499 105 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $651 42 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $554 40 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $480 25 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $404 18 payments
  8. UCB, Inc. $372 19 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $158 13 payments
  10. Celgene Corporation $151 9 payments
  11. Other $567 37 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,049 421 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $5,200 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,160 3 payments
  4. Education $210 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $1,579 76 payments
  2. Otezla $685 57 payments
  3. BENLYSTA $651 42 payments
  4. HUMIRA $532 31 payments
  5. XELJANZ $427 28 payments
  6. Enbrel $408 29 payments
  7. COSENTYX $390 23 payments
  8. Cimzia $372 19 payments
  9. TREMFYA $277 10 payments
  10. INFLECTRA $268 16 payments
  11. Other $3,310 212 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

3,295

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,232,919

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

19%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 40 $367,504
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 34 $323,194
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 32 $267,682
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 21 $154,344
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 11 $62,419
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 297 $8,348
Celecoxib Generic 199 $7,172
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 385 $6,846
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 45 $6,141
Tramadol Hcl Generic 430 $3,594

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 26 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,005,180

Of which drugs: $925,010

Medicare patients

422

Average age 72

Services billed

97,249

343 women, 79 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Depression 30%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Osteoporosis 28%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 20%
COPD 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 18 11,625 $393,556
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 20 18,524 $164,684
Injection, infliximab, excludes biosimilar, 10 mg J1745 Office 11 3,878 $96,668
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 14 35 $27

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $363
$363 32 —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $99
$99 — —
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $47
$47 — —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $47
$47 — —
ORENCIA
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $44
$44 11 11,625

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

430 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record