Medical Doctor Program year 2020 Reported 2019–2020 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alma Murphy

Ophthalmology Tucson, AZ Medical Doctor

NPI 1669476644 CMS profile 256696

490 N Alvernon Way, Ste 4, Tucson, AZ 85711

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,054

11 records reported · program years 2019–2020

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2020

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2020, Alma Murphy of Tucson, AZ is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $1,054 across 11 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 45th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2020 General $244 2
2019 General $810 9

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alma Murphy
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alma Murphy were reported at $0. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Alma Murphy Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $810 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $244 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $0 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $0 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $0 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $0 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $0 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $231 2 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $204 2 payments
  3. Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $140 2 payments
  4. Glaukos Corporation $130 1 payment
  5. Omeros Corporation $125 1 payment
  6. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $125 1 payment
  7. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $65 1 payment
  8. Alcon Vision LLC $35 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Food and Beverage $1,054 11 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. VYZULTA $204 2 payments
  2. Rhopressa $140 2 payments
  3. iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent System $130 1 payment
  4. iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent System $130 1 payment
  5. Omidria $125 1 payment
  6. INVELTYS $125 1 payment
  7. Rocklatan $118 1 payment
  8. BEOVU $114 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

2,364

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$214,074

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

18.6%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 216 $97,335
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 62 $51,345
Alphagan P Brimonidine Tartrate Brand 22 $10,068
Travoprost Generic 99 $8,562
Latanoprost Generic 886 $8,277
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 25 $6,970
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 127 $6,334
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 37 $5,975
Cyclosporine Generic 18 $5,367
Brimonidine Tartrate-Timolol Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 34 $5,302

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 25 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$125,304

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

903

Average age 76

Services billed

1,560

557 women, 346 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 62%
Arthritis 42%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 20%
Osteoporosis 20%
Depression 16%
Cancer 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

11 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Arizona

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record