Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Allen Beachy

Family Medicine Fort Smith, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1104853860 CMS profile 451788

3700 Cliff Dr, Fort Smith, AR 72903

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$20,563

1,165 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Allen Beachy of Fort Smith, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $20,563 across 1,165 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,144 45
2024 General $3,797 179
2023 General $3,486 204
2022 General $3,544 218
2021 General $3,781 209
2020 General $2,019 122
2019 General $2,792 188

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Allen Beachy
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Allen Beachy were reported at $1,144. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Allen Beachy Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,792 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,019 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $3,781 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $3,544 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $3,486 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $3,797 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $1,144 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,645 174 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,258 79 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,842 91 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,744 74 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $1,272 109 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $1,262 73 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $999 68 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $815 65 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $705 37 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $701 40 payments
  11. Other $6,320 355 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $20,527 1,160 payments
  2. Education $36 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. VRAYLAR $1,562 108 payments
  2. FARXIGA $1,332 36 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $1,258 68 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,040 44 payments
  5. BREZTRI $1,016 26 payments
  6. Ozempic $998 47 payments
  7. QULIPTA $812 37 payments
  8. Vascepa $792 44 payments
  9. EVENITY $740 43 payments
  10. Prolia $648 36 payments
  11. Other $16,076 1,035 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 165 drugs

Part D claims

12,277

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$861,133

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

17.5%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 116 $165,202
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 148 $114,691
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 85 $92,859
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 89 $77,149
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 62 $76,976
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 27 $43,241
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 21 $21,913
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 23 $21,071
Toujeo Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 21 $13,729
Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide Brand 19 $13,137

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 165 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$123,141

Of which drugs: $17,519

Medicare patients

444

Average age 74

Services billed

2,439

224 women, 220 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 38%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Depression 26%
Heart failure 19%
Osteoporosis 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 30 30 $8,716
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 88 90 $7,324

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$351 — —
QULIPTA
$314 — —
AIRSUPRA
$208 — —
FARXIGA
$193 89 —
Veozah
$191 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,165 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record