Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alina Kievsky

Nurse Practitioner, Family Los Angeles, CA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1295009306 CMS profile 11047504

7119 1/2 W Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90046

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,061

257 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alina Kievsky of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,061 across 257 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $952 46
2024 General $864 51
2023 General $844 42
2022 General $897 43
2021 General $1,505 75

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alina Kievsky
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alina Kievsky were reported at $952. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Alina Kievsky Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $1,505 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $897 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $844 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $864 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $952 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,741 86 payments
  2. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $516 28 payments
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $426 29 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $233 9 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $223 9 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $210 10 payments
  7. Amarin Pharma Inc. $185 12 payments
  8. Novo Nordisk Inc $160 7 payments
  9. Nestle HealthCare Nutrition Inc. $123 5 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $123 6 payments
  11. Other $1,121 56 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,061 257 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Repatha Cardiology $958 45 payments
  2. EVENITY $545 25 payments
  3. Otezla $517 27 payments
  4. Prolia $495 23 payments
  5. LEQVIO $398 27 payments
  6. XIFAXAN $328 17 payments
  7. TRULANCE $213 12 payments
  8. Vascepa $185 12 payments
  9. REPATHA Cardiovascular $185 13 payments
  10. MOUNJARO $182 7 payments
  11. Other $2,938 141 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 236 drugs

Part D claims

18,119

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$3,657,203

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

29%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Omeprazole-Sodium Bicarbonate Omeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Brand 437 $483,126
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 292 $300,174
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 312 $297,860
Creon Lipase/Protease/Amylase Brand 258 $246,927
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 335 $183,246
Metformin Er Gastric Metformin Hcl Brand 122 $177,474
Diclofenac Epolamine Generic 250 $136,241
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 233 $128,892
Diclofenac Sodium Generic 243 $111,927
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 161 $98,960

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 236 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$202,161

Of which drugs: $4,313

Medicare patients

245

Average age 76

Services billed

5,974

157 women, 88 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 73%
Depression 72%
Ischemic heart disease 63%
Alzheimer's or dementia 36%
Osteoporosis 29%
Heart failure 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, pyridoxine hcl, 100 mg J3415 Office 72 297 $3,352
Injection, thiamine hcl, 100 mg J3411 Office 72 297 $500
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 75 306 $313
Injection, magnesium sulfate, per 500 mg J3475 Office 72 297 $138

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $117
$117 — —
Prolia
  • Amgen Inc. $117
$117 22 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $117
$117 — —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $109
$109 — —
IBSRELA
  • Ardelyx, Inc. $69
$69 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

257 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record