Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Alexander Swan

Nephrology Brooklyn, NY Medical Doctor

NPI 1346218856 CMS profile 151055

667 61St St, # C1, Brooklyn, NY 11220

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$171,559

2,305 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Alexander Swan of Brooklyn, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $171,559 across 2,305 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $8,323 338
2024 General $19,310 339
2023 General $37,900 286
2022 General $43,934 345
2021 General $39,570 388
2020 General $15,862 333
2019 General $6,660 276

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Alexander Swan
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Alexander Swan were reported at $8,323. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Alexander Swan Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $6,660 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $15,862 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $39,570 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $43,934 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $37,900 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $19,310 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $8,323 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $35,656 299 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $30,121 318 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $29,171 54 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $23,128 242 payments
  5. OPKO Pharmaceuticals, LLC $14,927 90 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $9,259 126 payments
  7. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $6,051 13 payments
  8. Horizon Therapeutics plc $2,732 102 payments
  9. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $2,661 35 payments
  10. Calliditas Therapeutics US Inc. $2,594 12 payments
  11. Other $15,259 1,014 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $112,997 73 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $31,482 2,136 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $11,723 13 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $9,304 47 payments
  5. Honoraria $5,445 8 payments
  6. Education $609 28 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kerendia $29,157 53 payments
  2. FARXIGA $28,896 204 payments
  3. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $27,009 97 payments
  4. Repatha $20,493 99 payments
  5. RAYALDEE $13,566 76 payments
  6. VRAYLAR Neuroscience $9,882 103 payments
  7. LOKELMA $6,713 54 payments
  8. ACTHAR $6,051 13 payments
  9. KRYSTEXXA $2,642 92 payments
  10. VOQUEZNA $2,481 16 payments
  11. Other $30,244 1,896 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 182 drugs

Part D claims

15,603

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$7,888,049

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

40.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Krystexxa Pegloticase Brand 25 $1,415,954
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 480 $711,422
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 543 $657,034
Rayaldee Calcifediol Brand 201 $284,176
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 221 $251,521
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 202 $249,397
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 201 $245,289
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 125 $226,156
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 199 $224,286
Repatha Pushtronex Evolocumab Brand 169 $211,347

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 182 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$150,644

Of which drugs: $2,820

Medicare patients

207

Average age 72

Services billed

1,945

118 women, 89 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 71%
Arthritis 58%
Chronic kidney disease 37%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Heart failure 16%
Cancer 14%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 33 33 $2,700

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 45 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$4,833 129 —
Repatha
$3,562 371 —
RAYALDEE
$2,443 201 —
VOQUEZNA
$2,425 72 —
LOKELMA
$2,102 70 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 45 with Patron

Records

2,305 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nephrology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record