Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Akther Kotha

Rheumatology La Mesa, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1780609503 CMS profile 217143

8860 Center Dr, #400, La Mesa, CA 91942

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27,790

1,386 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$5,685 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2020

Through program year 2025, Akther Kotha of La Mesa, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,790 across 1,386 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $5,685 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 86th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $5,971 282
2024 General $5,873 291
2023 General $5,142 260
2022 General $3,311 188
2021 General $2,717 150
2020 General $2,203 110
2019 General $2,572 105

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Akther Kotha
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Akther Kotha were reported at $5,971. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Akther Kotha Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,572 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $2,203 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $2,717 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $3,311 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $5,142 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $5,873 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $5,971 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,446 231 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $4,190 235 payments
  3. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,762 171 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $2,131 118 payments
  5. Radius Health, Inc. $1,676 71 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,279 50 payments
  7. UCB, Inc. $1,225 75 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $1,224 54 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $1,114 56 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,055 55 payments
  11. Other $5,687 270 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $27,109 1,381 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $560 1 payment
  3. Education $87 2 payments
  4. Gift $34 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ $3,116 159 payments
  2. TREMFYA $2,486 116 payments
  3. SIMPONI ARIA $1,348 60 payments
  4. Otezla $1,246 82 payments
  5. ACTHAR $1,224 54 payments
  6. STELARA $1,167 54 payments
  7. Prolia $1,143 62 payments
  8. COSENTYX $1,128 60 payments
  9. Enbrel $1,092 74 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $1,041 54 payments
  11. Other $18,303 975 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 28 drugs

Part D claims

2,736

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$1,365,863

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

25.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 78 $530,408
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 36 $255,701
Enbrel Etanercept Brand 20 $168,793
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 24 $131,062
Xeljanz Xr Tofacitinib Citrate Brand 14 $79,463
Rinvoq Upadacitinib Brand 11 $70,158
Prolia Denosumab Brand 22 $35,895
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 432 $26,350
Rasuvo Methotrexate/Pf Brand 36 $24,242
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 394 $13,664

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 28 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 15 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$116,691

Of which drugs: $2,765

Medicare patients

296

Average age 72

Services billed

10,523

238 women, 58 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 57%
Diabetes 50%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Depression 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 101 8,920 $885
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 53 159 $583
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 23 36 $32

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$637 — —
RINVOQ
$631 11 —
COSENTYX
$325 — —
ACTHAR
$292 — —
Cimzia
$265 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,386 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record