Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Young

Interventional Pain Medicine Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1073769287 CMS profile 94636

1653 W Congress Pkwy, 739 Jelke, Chicago, IL 60612

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,140

285 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Adam Young of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,140 across 285 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,045 75
2024 General $2,956 52
2023 General $14,603 50
2022 General $1,039 31
2021 General $1,361 37
2020 General $5,101 25
2019 General $1,034 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Young
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Young were reported at $3,045. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Adam Young Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,034 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $5,101 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $1,361 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $1,039 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $14,603 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $2,956 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $3,045 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Vertos Medical, Inc. $12,006 12 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $5,229 149 payments
  3. Baxter Healthcare $4,000 2 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,623 28 payments
  5. Saluda Medical Americas, Inc. $1,334 10 payments
  6. Painteq LLC $598 21 payments
  7. Nevro Corp. $571 8 payments
  8. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $510 9 payments
  9. Medtronic USA, Inc. $428 8 payments
  10. Nalu Medical, Inc. $329 3 payments
  11. Other $2,512 35 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $15,500 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,537 272 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,070 5 payments
  4. Education $33 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. mild Device Kit $12,006 12 payments
  2. Fluid Systems - Infusion Systems $3,000 1 payment
  3. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $1,331 21 payments
  4. Evoke SCS $1,098 6 payments
  5. Intracept $1,016 9 payments
  6. Fluid Systems - Research Devel $1,000 1 payment
  7. PROCLAIM $931 31 payments
  8. Proclaim IPG $837 23 payments
  9. ETERNA Neuromodulation $698 13 payments
  10. ETERNA Structural Heart $644 16 payments
  11. Other $6,570 150 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 27 drugs

Part D claims

3,135

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$72,558

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

17.4%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Buprenorphine Generic 136 $27,023
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 485 $9,736
Pregabalin Generic 420 $9,313
Gabapentin Generic 590 $5,258
Etodolac Generic 89 $3,815
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 211 $3,569
Lidocaine Generic 26 $3,486
Meloxicam Generic 249 $1,332
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 50 $1,217
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 106 $1,116

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 27 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 112 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$508,575

Of which drugs: $47,355

Medicare patients

769

Average age 77

Services billed

19,114

502 women, 267 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 32%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Depression 22%
Heart failure 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, betamethasone acetate 3 mg and betamethasone sodium phosphate 3 mg J0702 Office 404 1,838 $10,111
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 70 4,615 $479
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 393 1,839 $190
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 58 680 $61

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Qutenza
  • Averitas Pharma Inc. $173
$173 — —
DYSPORT
  • Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

285 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record