Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Sandeep Amin

Interventional Pain Medicine Chicago, IL Medical Doctor

NPI 1184792251 CMS profile 235761

1653 W Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$429,666

676 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$107 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2019

Through program year 2025, Sandeep Amin of Chicago, IL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $429,666 across 676 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $107 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Interventional Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $51,972 111
2024 General $58,358 119
2023 General $39,442 97
2022 General $62,628 110
2021 General $80,337 90
2020 General $44,294 32
2019 General $92,636 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Sandeep Amin
  • Interventional Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Interventional Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Sandeep Amin were reported at $51,972. Among 1,891 Interventional Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $657 and the middle half received between $184 and $1,753.

Show as a table
Year Sandeep Amin Interventional Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $92,636 $684 $216–$2,079 $163
2020 $44,294 $382 $122–$1,109 $114
2021 $80,337 $552 $167–$1,554 $132
2022 $62,628 $605 $187–$1,924 $149
2023 $39,442 $671 $195–$1,915 $160
2024 $58,358 $684 $206–$1,837 $164
2025 $51,972 $657 $184–$1,753 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Avanos Medical $262,172 193 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $71,626 260 payments
  3. Nevro Corp. $40,513 68 payments
  4. Boston Scientific Corporation $30,735 55 payments
  5. Spinal Simplicity, LLC $8,589 42 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $7,952 14 payments
  7. Medtronic USA, Inc. $4,978 12 payments
  8. Vertiflex, Inc. $1,630 5 payments
  9. Nalu Medical, Inc. $459 6 payments
  10. BIOTRONIK NRO, Inc. $280 3 payments
  11. Other $734 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Honoraria $230,305 49 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $59,725 22 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $58,445 38 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $37,982 154 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $18,504 399 payments
  6. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $16,255 9 payments
  7. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a non-accredited and noncertified continuing education program $4,950 3 payments
  8. Education $3,500 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. COOLIEF $168,992 56 payments
  2. COOLIEF* COOLED RADIOFREQUENCY $42,227 34 payments
  3. COOLED RFA $33,163 9 payments
  4. Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System $24,432 34 payments
  5. Proclaim Family of SCS IPGs $22,210 39 payments
  6. PROCLAIM $19,039 78 payments
  7. GENERATOR $17,475 85 payments
  8. Omnia $12,719 15 payments
  9. General - Therapies $9,357 10 payments
  10. Neuromodulation Dspsbls and Accs $8,730 4 payments
  11. Other $67,098 307 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

2,203

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$106,600

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

28.4%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nucynta Tapentadol Hcl Brand 21 $22,050
Oxycontin Oxycodone Hcl Brand 18 $16,233
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 379 $13,116
Movantik Naloxegol Oxalate Brand 32 $12,575
Buprenorphine Generic 44 $10,611
Lidocaine Generic 40 $4,298
Gabapentin Generic 240 $3,428
Morphine Sulfate Er Morphine Sulfate Brand 76 $3,049
Pregabalin Generic 152 $2,661
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 210 $2,435

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 111 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$206,497

Of which drugs: $375

Medicare patients

495

Average age 71

Services billed

5,046

334 women, 161 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 34%
Depression 34%
Chronic kidney disease 29%
Osteoporosis 24%
Heart failure 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 53 2,884 $292
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 40 mg J1030 Office 14 18 $66

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $14
$14 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

676 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Interventional Pain Medicine in Illinois

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record