Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Adam Wiener

Dermatology Melbourne, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1215102041 CMS profile 99964

333 E Sheridan Rd, Melbourne, FL 32901

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$27,868

647 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Adam Wiener of Melbourne, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $27,868 across 647 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 90th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,304 100
2024 General $6,337 109
2023 General $9,881 91
2022 General $2,708 112
2021 General $1,985 100
2020 General $1,676 69
2019 General $1,976 66

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Adam Wiener
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Adam Wiener were reported at $3,304. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Adam Wiener Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,976 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $1,676 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,985 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $2,708 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $9,881 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $6,337 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $3,304 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $11,345 44 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $2,868 125 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $1,770 37 payments
  4. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,627 67 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $929 37 payments
  6. LEO Pharma Inc. $928 30 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $922 20 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $895 46 payments
  9. Mayne Pharma Inc. $729 44 payments
  10. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $710 32 payments
  11. Other $5,145 165 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,955 636 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $10,460 6 payments
  3. Education $453 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CIBINQO $10,911 33 payments
  2. TREMFYA $1,952 45 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $1,459 29 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $1,438 63 payments
  5. HUMIRA $981 49 payments
  6. Otezla $922 20 payments
  7. TALTZ $739 33 payments
  8. ADBRY $665 22 payments
  9. RINVOQ $586 25 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology $514 15 payments
  11. Other $8,992 428 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

658

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$135,811

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

11.2%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 22 $121,256
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 46 $2,639
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 23 $2,308
Ketoconazole Generic 97 $1,776
Fluocinonide Generic 39 $1,745
Tacrolimus Generic 17 $1,179
Fluorouracil Generic 16 $931
Hydrocortisone Generic 73 $895
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 87 $761
Metronidazole Generic 14 $440

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 93 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$755,481

Of which drugs: $8,487

Medicare patients

1,106

Average age 76

Services billed

9,115

493 women, 613 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Diabetes 24%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Cancer 18%
Depression 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 20%, single unit dosage form (354 mg) J7308 Office 25 27 $8,360
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 70 153 $111

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
CIBINQO
  • PFIZER INC. $3,485
$3,485 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $597
$597 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $402
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $66
$468 22 —
SOTYKTU
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $279
$279 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $253
$253 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

647 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record