Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Xience Short Dapt 28 US

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03815175

Research payments

$597,575

218 payments

Through program year 2019, $597,575 in research payments was reported against Xience Short Dapt 28 US, across 218 payments, paid by Abbott Laboratories.

Paid by
Abbott Laboratories
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03815175

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $597,575 218

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Abbott Laboratories $597,575 218 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Western Institutional Review Board Organisation paid for research $66,264 81 payments
  2. Anmed Health Teaching hospital · SC $50,422 4 payments
  3. Heart Center Research LLC Organisation paid for research $38,131 5 payments
  4. Clearwater Cardiovascular And Interventional Consultants, Md, PA Organisation paid for research $34,842 5 payments
  5. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $31,065 3 payments
  6. Massachusetts General Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $28,205 4 payments
  7. Cardiovascular Research Institute Of Kansas Llc Organisation paid for research $27,900 3 payments
  8. McLaren Health Care Organisation paid for research $19,750 6 payments
  9. Southern California Permanente Medical Group Organisation paid for research $19,602 4 payments
  10. Jackson Heart Clinic PA Organisation paid for research $19,073 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record