Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Xenform A A Postmarket

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01945580

Research payments

$91,940

36 payments

Through program year 2019, $91,940 in research payments was reported against Xenform A A Postmarket, across 36 payments, paid by Boston Scientific Corporation.

Paid by
Boston Scientific Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01945580

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $91,940 36

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $91,940 36 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. University Of North Carolina Hospital Organisation paid for research $13,700 5 payments
  2. Mount Auburn Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $11,869 2 payments
  3. Northshore University Healthsystem Teaching hospital · IL $9,188 2 payments
  4. Ace Research Services INC Organisation paid for research $8,839 1 payment
  5. Emory University Hospital Teaching hospital · GA $7,254 4 payments
  6. Cherokee Women's Health Specialist Organisation paid for research $6,475 1 payment
  7. Unified Womens Care Of Georgia Organisation paid for research $6,375 1 payment
  8. Augusta University Research Institute INC Organisation paid for research $5,700 1 payment
  9. Research Foundation Of State Unversity Of New York Organisation paid for research $4,692 1 payment
  10. Las Colinas Ob Gyn Infertility Assn Organisation paid for research $4,373 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record