Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Viper LT HPV Longitudinal

Research payments

$1,207,565

32 payments

Through program year 2022, $1,207,565 in research payments was reported against Viper LT HPV Longitudinal, across 32 payments, paid by Becton, Dickinson and Company.

Paid by
Becton, Dickinson and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $36,140 1
2020 Research $1,645 1
2019 Research $1,169,780 30

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Becton, Dickinson and Company $1,207,565 32 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. University Of New Mexico Hospital Teaching hospital · NM $629,720 1 payment
  2. Research Pathology Organisation paid for research $205,828 2 payments
  3. Q Squared Solutions Organisation paid for research $89,241 1 payment
  4. Altus Research, INC Organisation paid for research $61,996 1 payment
  5. Healthcare Clinical Data Inc Organisation paid for research $36,140 1 payment
  6. Healthcare Clinical Organisation paid for research $36,054 1 payment
  7. Chattanooga Medical Organisation paid for research $22,876 1 payment
  8. Eastern Carolina Wo Organisation paid for research $21,075 1 payment
  9. Health Awareness In Organisation paid for research $15,299 1 payment
  10. West Coast Medical Organisation paid for research $13,362 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record