Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Vesalius-Cv

Research payments

$6,744,018

321 payments

Through program year 2019, $6,744,018 in research payments was reported against Vesalius-Cv, across 321 payments, paid by Amgen Inc..

Paid by
Amgen Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $6,744,018 321

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Amgen Inc. $6,744,018 321 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Brigham And Womens Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $1,907,999 4 payments
  2. Lillestol Research LLC Organisation paid for research $166,809 4 payments
  3. Palm Research Center INC Organisation paid for research $143,211 3 payments
  4. Cardiovascular Research Center Of South Florida Organisation paid for research $117,231 4 payments
  5. North Shore Diabetes And Endocrine Associates Organisation paid for research $114,890 2 payments
  6. George E Platt MD Organisation paid for research $100,902 1 payment
  7. University Of Iowa Hosp & Clinics Teaching hospital · IA $95,395 3 payments
  8. North Shore Diabetes & Endocrine As Organisation paid for research $90,129 1 payment
  9. Suffolk Multispecialty Research LLC Organisation paid for research $82,565 1 payment
  10. North Ohio Heart Center Organisation paid for research $78,382 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record