Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Two Level Simplify Cervical Artificial Disc IDE Study

Research payments

$147,336

33 payments

Through program year 2022, $147,336 in research payments was reported against Two Level Simplify Cervical Artificial Disc IDE Study, across 33 payments, paid by NuVasive, Inc..

Paid by
NuVasive, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $61,748 17
2021 Research $85,588 16

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. NuVasive, Inc. $147,336 33 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. The Foundation For Spinal Restoration Organisation paid for research $60,892 4 payments
  2. Southern Orthopaedic Associates SC Organisation paid for research $14,400 1 payment
  3. Scientific Education and Research Foundation Organisation paid for research $11,169 1 payment
  4. Spine Institute Of Louisiana Organisation paid for research $10,800 3 payments
  5. Tbi Clinical Research, LLC Organisation paid for research $9,009 1 payment
  6. William Beaumont Hospital Organisation paid for research $6,856 4 payments
  7. Physicians Medical Center LLC Organisation paid for research $6,000 2 payments
  8. Sparta Spine Organisation paid for research $5,533 2 payments
  9. Ashvin Patel Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Sarasota, FL $5,204 5 payments
  10. Indiana Spine Group Pc Organisation paid for research $4,000 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record