Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Tula Registry

Research payments

$272,774

110 payments

Through program year 2025, $272,774 in research payments was reported against Tula Registry, across 110 payments, paid by Smith+Nephew, Inc..

Paid by
Smith+Nephew, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $4,618 3
2024 Research $185,547 67
2023 Research $82,609 40

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $272,774 110 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Peak Pediatric Ear Nose and Throat Organisation paid for research $157,965 68 payments
  2. Regional Otolaryngology Head and Neck Associates, LLC Organisation paid for research $54,975 16 payments
  3. The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Organisation paid for research $33,075 3 payments
  4. Advanced ENT and Allergy, PLLC Organisation paid for research $11,213 12 payments
  5. Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Organisation paid for research $5,787 6 payments
  6. Ogden Clinic Professional Corporation Organisation paid for research $5,495 3 payments
  7. Wellstar Health System Inc. Organisation paid for research $2,764 1 payment
  8. California Head and Neck Specialists. Ear, Nose & Throat Center Organisation paid for research $1,500 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record