Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

The Citadel Embolization Device Feasibility Study

Research payments

$1,686,401

231 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,686,401 in research payments was reported against The Citadel Embolization Device Feasibility Study, across 231 payments, paid by Stryker Corporation.

Paid by
Stryker Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $612,728 84
2024 Research $429,288 51
2023 Research $256,326 40
2022 Research $153,024 28
2021 Research $180,826 18
2020 Research $33,549 5
2019 Research $20,660 5

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Stryker Corporation $1,686,401 231 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital Teaching hospital · CA $188,368 5 payments
  2. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $156,799 17 payments
  3. Oculus Imaging LLC Organisation paid for research $118,366 33 payments
  4. University Of Kentuckyresearch Foundation Organisation paid for research $112,209 14 payments
  5. State Of West Virginiawest Virginia University Organisation paid for research $111,466 9 payments
  6. Baptist Health Lexington Teaching hospital · KY $109,836 9 payments
  7. Univ Of Massachusetts Worcester Organisation paid for research $106,448 8 payments
  8. University Of Kansas Medical Center Organisation paid for research $80,932 13 payments
  9. Harborview Medical Center Teaching hospital · WA $70,010 3 payments
  10. University Of Miamioffice Of Research Administration O Organisation paid for research $44,718 7 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record