Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Research study Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Taltz Psa Observational Study

Research payments

$531,651

33 payments

Through program year 2023, $531,651 in research payments was reported against Taltz Psa Observational Study, across 33 payments, paid by Eli Lilly and Company.

Paid by
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $531,651 33

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2023
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $531,651 33 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2023
  1. Biovin Enterprises LLC Organisation paid for research $197,999 4 payments
  2. Ravenswood Rheumatology Organisation paid for research $39,120 1 payment
  3. Altoona Center For Clinical Research Pc Organisation paid for research $28,852 1 payment
  4. Arizona Arthritis And Rheumatology Research Organisation paid for research $26,580 4 payments
  5. Kur Research Organisation paid for research $19,400 1 payment
  6. Tamar Brionez Organisation paid for research $18,019 1 payment
  7. Believe Clinical Trials Organisation paid for research $17,793 1 payment
  8. Rheumatology Center Of San Diego Pc Organisation paid for research $17,263 1 payment
  9. Corazon USA LLC Organisation paid for research $15,140 1 payment
  10. Kerlo Research Organisation paid for research $12,017 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Records

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record