Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ta799-012

Research payments

$1,840,676

515 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,840,676 in research payments was reported against Ta799-012, across 515 payments, paid by VectivBio AG.

Paid by
VectivBio AG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $363,052 38
2024 Research $937,676 63
2023 Research $539,948 414

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. VectivBio AG $1,840,676 515 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. The Regents of The University of California Organisation paid for research $611,899 9 payments
  2. Ronald Reagan Ucla Teaching hospital · CA $211,810 249 payments
  3. ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Organisation paid for research $107,813 27 payments
  4. Childrens Hospital Medical Center Teaching hospital · OH $91,482 14 payments
  5. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Teaching hospital · TN $89,760 59 payments
  6. University Of Washington Organisation paid for research $78,584 6 payments
  7. University Of Nebraska Medical Center Organisation paid for research $72,518 6 payments
  8. Northwestern University Organisation paid for research $71,295 10 payments
  9. Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Organisation paid for research $54,744 7 payments
  10. Cleveland Clinic Foundation Organisation paid for research $48,924 5 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record