Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Supporting Patients Undergoing HIgh-Risk PCI Using a High-Flow Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support Device (SHIELD II)

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02468778

Research payments

$531,719

296 payments

Through program year 2020, $531,719 in research payments was reported against Supporting Patients Undergoing HIgh-Risk PCI Using a High-Flow Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support Device (SHIELD II), across 296 payments, paid by Abbott Laboratories.

Paid by
Abbott Laboratories
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02468778

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $531,719 296

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Abbott Laboratories $531,719 296 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Mount Sinai School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $103,723 4 payments
  2. Western Institutional Review Board Organisation paid for research $66,872 86 payments
  3. University of the State of New York (University at Buffalo) Organisation paid for research $19,657 7 payments
  4. Baylor College Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $19,206 5 payments
  5. Piedmont Heart Institute INC Organisation paid for research $18,000 1 payment
  6. Dell Seton Medical Center At The Uni Teaching hospital · TX $17,697 4 payments
  7. Columbia University Medical Center Organisation paid for research $15,970 3 payments
  8. Cardiovascular Research Institute Of Kansas Llc Organisation paid for research $14,972 3 payments
  9. Southern California Permanente Medical Group Organisation paid for research $14,123 4 payments
  10. Baylor Research Institute Organisation paid for research $14,000 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record