Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Bf-200 Ala (Ameluz) in the Field-Directed Treatment of Actinic Keratosis (Ak) on the Extremities and Neck/Trunk With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Using A Rhodoled Lamp

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05662202

Research payments

$505,819

53 payments

Through program year 2025, $505,819 in research payments was reported against Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Bf-200 Ala (Ameluz) in the Field-Directed Treatment of Actinic Keratosis (Ak) on the Extremities and Neck/Trunk With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) Using A Rhodoled Lamp, across 53 payments, paid by Biofrontera Inc..

Paid by
Biofrontera Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05662202

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $505,819 53

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Biofrontera Inc. $505,819 53 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Indiana Clinical Trials Center Organisation paid for research $132,057 11 payments
  2. Delricht Research Organisation paid for research $99,102 18 payments
  3. Gwinnett Clinical Research Center INC Organisation paid for research $50,970 1 payment
  4. Alliance Dermatology & Mohs Center Organisation paid for research $45,231 4 payments
  5. Skin Search Of Rochester Organisation paid for research $44,730 4 payments
  6. Aboutskin Dermatology & Derm Surgery Organisation paid for research $31,768 1 payment
  7. Rochester Dermatologic Surgery Organisation paid for research $28,426 2 payments
  8. Medical Dermatology Specialists Organisation paid for research $27,517 3 payments
  9. Clinical Research Center Of The Carolinas Organisation paid for research $24,112 2 payments
  10. Austin Institute For Clinical Research INC Organisation paid for research $14,041 6 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record