Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

SOFia Aspiration System as first line Technique

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04451525

Research payments

$4,496,515

461 payments

Through program year 2025, $4,496,515 in research payments was reported against SOFia Aspiration System as first line Technique, across 461 payments, paid by MicroVention, Inc..

Paid by
MicroVention, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT04451525

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,217,697 151
2024 Research $2,211,164 177
2023 Research $826,318 96
2022 Research $241,337 37

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. MicroVention, Inc. $4,496,515 461 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. State of Maryland Organisation paid for research $311,181 12 payments
  2. University of Cincinnati Organisation paid for research $287,949 7 payments
  3. The Toledo Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $274,133 30 payments
  4. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $257,488 9 payments
  5. Research Foundation Of Suny Organisation paid for research $234,860 15 payments
  6. Memorial Health System Teaching hospital · CO $231,458 22 payments
  7. Washington University Organisation paid for research $208,558 13 payments
  8. Munson Medical Center Teaching hospital · MI $168,854 20 payments
  9. Abbott Northwestern Hospital Teaching hospital · MN $158,278 10 payments
  10. Geisinger Clinic Organisation paid for research $148,768 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record