Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

SJM Brady MRI Post Approval Study

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03170583

Research payments

$546,439

345 payments

Through program year 2020, $546,439 in research payments was reported against SJM Brady MRI Post Approval Study, across 345 payments, paid by Abbott Laboratories.

Paid by
Abbott Laboratories
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03170583

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $546,439 345

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Abbott Laboratories $546,439 345 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Western Institutional Review Board Organisation paid for research $79,499 93 payments
  2. Cardiology Associates Of Northeast Arkansas Organisation paid for research $63,563 4 payments
  3. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $23,464 6 payments
  4. Jackson Heart Clinic PA Organisation paid for research $22,502 6 payments
  5. South Texas Cardiovascular Consultants Organisation paid for research $18,576 4 payments
  6. Ochsner Clinic Foundation Teaching hospital · LA $16,816 5 payments
  7. Aurora Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $15,833 7 payments
  8. The Regents of The University of California Organisation paid for research $15,755 5 payments
  9. Arkansas Site Management Services Organisation paid for research $15,227 6 payments
  10. Erlanger Medical Center Teaching hospital · TN $13,684 5 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record