Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Rvl-202

Research payments

$159,326

52 payments

Through program year 2019, $159,326 in research payments was reported against Rvl-202, across 52 payments, paid by Osmotica Pharmaceutical Corp..

Paid by
Osmotica Pharmaceutical Corp.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $159,326 52

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Osmotica Pharmaceutical Corp. $159,326 52 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Kannarr Eye Care Organisation paid for research $22,039 2 payments
  2. North Valley Eye Medical Group Organisation paid for research $22,024 3 payments
  3. Nature Cost Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $14,788 2 payments
  4. Danbury Eye Physicians And Surgeons Pc Organisation paid for research $11,633 4 payments
  5. Rochester Opthalmological Group Organisation paid for research $11,444 3 payments
  6. Orange County Opthalmology Medical Group Organisation paid for research $10,500 2 payments
  7. Shettle Eye Research INC Organisation paid for research $9,003 2 payments
  8. Comprehensive Eye Care Ltd Organisation paid for research $6,763 2 payments
  9. Drs Quinn Foster & Associates Organisation paid for research $6,063 3 payments
  10. Heart Of America Eye Care Organisation paid for research $5,838 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Records

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record