Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Rezum II Pivotal Study

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01912339

Research payments

$238,033

56 payments

Through program year 2021, $238,033 in research payments was reported against Rezum II Pivotal Study, across 56 payments, paid by Boston Scientific Corporation.

Paid by
Boston Scientific Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01912339

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $5,690 3
2020 Research $26,619 17
2019 Research $205,724 36

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $238,033 56 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Jean Brown Research Organisation paid for research $66,589 8 payments
  2. Texas Urology Organisation paid for research $27,740 3 payments
  3. South Florida Medical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $23,300 4 payments
  4. Chesapeake Urology Associates Organisation paid for research $23,074 9 payments
  5. Arizona Institute Of Urology Organisation paid for research $22,563 4 payments
  6. Carolina Radiology Associates Organisation paid for research $18,724 4 payments
  7. Metro Urology Organisation paid for research $11,271 5 payments
  8. Tri State Urologic Services INC Organisation paid for research $11,004 3 payments
  9. Board Of Trustees Southern Illinois University Organisation paid for research $8,545 3 payments
  10. Mayo Clinic Rochester Organisation paid for research $5,690 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record