Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Pvp-Ic1901

Research payments

$1,124,982

69 payments

Through program year 2022, $1,124,982 in research payments was reported against Pvp-Ic1901, across 69 payments, paid by Provepharm Inc..

Paid by
Provepharm Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $98,044 11
2021 Research $561,232 25
2020 Research $402,867 27
2019 Research $62,840 6

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Provepharm Inc. $1,124,982 69 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Women's Healthcare Associates Organisation paid for research $198,500 2 payments
  2. Urology San Antonio PA Organisation paid for research $134,756 1 payment
  3. The University Of South Florida Organisation paid for research $133,500 2 payments
  4. Suzanne Gagnon Internal Medicine · North Wales, PA $122,970 4 payments
  5. Palmetto Research Organisation paid for research $113,200 3 payments
  6. Skykine Urology Organisation paid for research $55,250 1 payment
  7. Arizona Institute Of Urology Organisation paid for research $51,265 2 payments
  8. Adult & Pediatric Urology Pc Organisation paid for research $46,455 2 payments
  9. Copernicus Group IRB Organisation paid for research $44,560 16 payments
  10. Herbert Lepor Urology · New York, NY $39,650 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record