Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Precision Retrospective Outcomes Pro Study

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01550575

Research payments

$394,054

94 payments

Through program year 2021, $394,054 in research payments was reported against Precision Retrospective Outcomes Pro Study, across 94 payments, paid by Boston Scientific Corporation.

Paid by
Boston Scientific Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01550575

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $394,054 94

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $394,054 94 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Vitamed Research LLC Organisation paid for research $77,270 7 payments
  2. Toledo Clinic Organisation paid for research $60,444 13 payments
  3. Uh Cleveland Medical Center Teaching hospital · OH $55,972 11 payments
  4. Axis Spine Pllc Organisation paid for research $34,780 9 payments
  5. Matthew Hammond Physician Assistant, Surgical · Pensacola, FL $30,810 5 payments
  6. Richard Ferro Interventional Pain Medicine · Lansing, MI $30,163 8 payments
  7. Andrew Will Pain Medicine · Edina, MN $24,577 10 payments
  8. Piedmont Interventional Pain Care PA Organisation paid for research $19,650 3 payments
  9. Verdolin Medicolegal Consulting Inc Organisation paid for research $15,464 2 payments
  10. Tampa Pain Relief Center INC Organisation paid for research $10,665 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record