Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Post Approval Study of the AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Toric IOL (Models SND1T3-T6)

Research payments

$1,876,651

3,623 payments

Through program year 2019, $1,876,651 in research payments was reported against Post Approval Study of the AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Toric IOL (Models SND1T3-T6), across 3,623 payments, paid by Alcon Research LLC.

Paid by
Alcon Research LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $1,876,651 3,623

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Alcon Research LLC $1,876,651 3,623 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Raymond Fong Ophthalmology · New York, NY $254,874 575 payments
  2. Jeffrey Horn Ophthalmology · Nashville, TN $172,275 502 payments
  3. Mid Florida Eye Center PA Organisation paid for research $132,286 294 payments
  4. Newsom Eye & Laser Center INC Organisation paid for research $107,259 103 payments
  5. Cei Physicians Psc INC Organisation paid for research $100,576 260 payments
  6. SightTrust Eye Institute Organisation paid for research $95,017 219 payments
  7. Centro Oftalmologico Metropolitano Organisation paid for research $94,213 213 payments
  8. Kleiman Evangelista Eye Center Organisation paid for research $84,473 188 payments
  9. Central Florida Eye Specialists Organisation paid for research $80,479 211 payments
  10. St. Louis Eye Institute and Laser Center Organisation paid for research $73,818 118 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record