Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

PhIII Ide-Cel vs Triplet Regimens RRMM 3L (bb2121-MM-003; KarMMa-3) - A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 Versus Standard Regimens in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRM

Research payments

$7,637,725

74 payments

Through program year 2024, $7,637,725 in research payments was reported against PhIII Ide-Cel vs Triplet Regimens RRMM 3L (bb2121-MM-003; KarMMa-3) - A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of bb2121 Versus Standard Regimens in Subjects with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRM, across 74 payments, paid by Celgene Corporation.

Paid by
Celgene Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $2,021,299 38
2023 Research $5,513,058 32
2022 Research $103,368 4

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2024
  1. Celgene Corporation $7,637,725 74 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2024
  1. Ut Md Anderson Cancer Center Teaching hospital · TX $1,572,267 2 payments
  2. Mayo Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · AZ $615,620 3 payments
  3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Teaching hospital · MA $545,732 4 payments
  4. Northside Hospital, Inc Organisation paid for research $470,377 1 payment
  5. U Of Utah Neuropsychiatric Institute Teaching hospital · UT $391,018 2 payments
  6. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Organisation paid for research $344,023 2 payments
  7. University Of Colorado Denver Office Of Grants Contracts Organisation paid for research $334,155 2 payments
  8. Board Of Regents Of The University Of Wisconsin System Organisation paid for research $321,576 2 payments
  9. Thomas Jefferson University Organisation paid for research $252,786 2 payments
  10. Weill Cornell Medical College Organisation paid for research $232,300 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record