Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Phase 2 UC

Research payments

$325,841

22 payments

Through program year 2020, $325,841 in research payments was reported against Phase 2 UC, across 22 payments, paid by E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C..

Paid by
E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $25,495 20
2019 Research $300,346 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $325,841 22 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Providence Portland Medical Center Teaching hospital · OR $279,840 1 payment
  2. Spring Gastroenterology Organisation paid for research $20,506 1 payment
  3. Lenus Research Organisation paid for research $13,531 1 payment
  4. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Teaching hospital · TN $10,548 1 payment
  5. University of Florida Organisation paid for research $267 1 payment
  6. New York Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates Organisation paid for research $98 1 payment
  7. Advanced Biomedical Research Of America Organisation paid for research $93 1 payment
  8. Chevy Chase Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $87 1 payment
  9. Rapid City Medical Center Main Clinic Organisation paid for research $72 1 payment
  10. Advanced Research Institute - New Port Richey Organisation paid for research $72 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record