Research study Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Phase 2 longterm Open Label Extension Study in UC

Research payments

$854,775

155 payments

Through program year 2023, $854,775 in research payments was reported against Phase 2 longterm Open Label Extension Study in UC, across 155 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $29,543 3
2022 Research $27,809 4
2021 Research $72,604 6
2020 Research $266,387 26
2019 Research $458,431 116

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $812,680 61 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG $42,094 94 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Texas Digestive Disease Consultants Pllc Organisation paid for research $153,079 7 payments
  2. University of Chicago Organisation paid for research $54,158 4 payments
  3. The Trustees Of Columbia University Organisation paid for research $52,808 2 payments
  4. Medical Research Center Of Organisation paid for research $35,780 2 payments
  5. Baylor College Of Medicine Allergy Organisation paid for research $35,342 1 payment
  6. Digestive Disease Specialists INC Organisation paid for research $33,938 4 payments
  7. Emory University Organisation paid for research $33,718 2 payments
  8. Mcguire Research Institute Organisation paid for research $31,000 2 payments
  9. The Trustees Of Columbia University In Organisation paid for research $29,274 1 payment
  10. Icahn School Of Medicine Atty Mount S Organisation paid for research $28,520 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record